Juror Three is the last juror to change his vote; nothing anyone says can convince him that there is a \"reasonable doubt\" in the case. This man was the most stubborn of all. He refused to pay attention to things that were being stated in order save the defendant from death. It was as if the word guilty seemed to dwell in his mind and was unable to be altered. He becomes outraged that the others are changing their votes and letting this kid \"slip through their fingers.\" He says that the whole case is based on the testimony of the woman across the el-tracks. The jurors play out the murder to themselves, and talk about the lady across the street. They notice several things about her. The lady claimed that she saw the murder through the last two cars on the train that was passing. A juror also noticed that she had indents in her nose which means she wore glasses. She never mentioned the glasses in the trial. It was finally agreed with eleven jurors that there was \"reasonable......
Join Now or Login to view the rest of this paper.
Approximate Word Count: 1460
Approximate Pages: 6 (260 words per double-spaced page) |