Saved Papers

Save papers so you can find them more easily...


Join Now

Get instant access to our database of over 100,000 papers.

Join Now!

In Certain Cases Porter's Diamond Of Competitive Advantage May Not Be An Appropriate Framework For The Analysis Of A Nation's Sources Of Competitive Advantage.


Join Now
Credit Card
Join Now
PayPal
 

Introduction
Since its publication in 1990, Michael Porter's book The Competitive Advantage of Nations has attracted much consideration. The main analytical tool of the book is the diamond of competitive advantage (figure 1). This model is based on four country specific "determinants" and two external variables. Porter's four determinants and two outside forces interact in a "diamond" of competitive advantage, with the nature of a country's international competitiveness depending upon the type and quality of these interactions. However, because it is fundamentally a home-based model of international competitiveness, the diamond theory is criticized by many international business scholars. Dunning , and Rugman ¬, ¬¬ point out that the influence on competitiveness of two-way foreign direct investment (FDI) and foreign government influence and interference on trade and investment have been neglected. Rugman and Collinson have also evaluated the model and identified eight areas......

Join Now or Login to view the rest of this paper.

Approximate Word Count: 1584
Approximate Pages: 7 (260 words per double-spaced page)

Why should you join TermPapersMonthly?
- It's secure and completely anonymous.
- You get instant access to over 100,000 papers.
- Prompt and helpful customer support.

Credit Card
PayPal