... was mentioned earlier. Deciding between fighting litigation and using an ADR was critical to the survival and marketing edge Alumina has in the aluminum products industry. When two parties initially adopt extreme and unreasonable positions, it is almost impossible for the situation to be rectified using exclusively negotiation or settlement. Bates is claiming her daughter's leukemia caused by the contact she had with a toxic substance found within her drinking water. That substance, she claims, was generated through the negligence of Alumina. As with most toxic tort cases (www-space.arc.nasa.gov/~astrochm/PAHs.html) "a plaintiff complaining of toxic exposure is not obligated to prove his or her case "beyond a reasonable doubt". Instead, he or she must only prove that "his or her claims are merely more likely true than not." Since the daughter is the same age as the previous Alumina EPA violation, there would be a notable correlation between the water pollutants, Polycyclic......
Join Now or Login to view the rest of this paper.
Approximate Word Count: 643
Approximate Pages: 3 (260 words per double-spaced page) |