Saved Papers

Save papers so you can find them more easily...


Join Now

Get instant access to our database of over 100,000 papers.

Join Now!

Factum


Join Now
Credit Card
Join Now
PayPal
 

The Court File No.: 234567891

Superior Court of Justice
(Ontario)
BETWEEN:

R.

Plaintiff

v.


ROB ROBERTS

Defendant

FACTUM OF THE PLAINTIFF


PART I – THE FACTS

1. Rob Roberts was recently charged with a narcotics offence. Police Constables Smith and Weston received an anonymous tip that Mr. Roberts was a drug distributor. The officers had never heard of Mr. Roberts, nor had they ever suspected him to be involved in narcotics.
2. Constables Smith and Weston decided to look up Mr. Roberts’ address and search his property. At 10:00pm on 15 October, 2007 Constables Smith and Weston attended Mr. Roberts’ house, located in the Erb Street area of the City of Waterloo.
3. The officers did not obtain a search warrant. In fact, further evidence will demonstrate that they would have failed to obtain one in any event. In spite of this, they made the decision to search Mr. Roberts’ property anyway.
4. A neighbour will testify that at approximately......

Join Now or Login to view the rest of this paper.

Approximate Word Count: 1031
Approximate Pages: 4 (260 words per double-spaced page)

Why should you join TermPapersMonthly?
- It's secure and completely anonymous.
- You get instant access to over 100,000 papers.
- Prompt and helpful customer support.

Credit Card
PayPal