globalization has both advantages and disadvantages and this is why it is easy to find debates about globalization. The important point is to determine which outweighs the other one. My point of view on this issue is closer to Friedman’s perspective, but I don’t think Friedman was able to support his side effectively compared to Naim. Knowing that he is proficient enough to write two books about globalization and I would expect him to make stronger points and respond effectively to other side’s oppositions. For example, he says “Is that less important than say a daily protest in Hong Kong?” Is it that easy to undervalue thousands of people on Hong Kong streets and millions of other people who agree with them? He is as disregardful as a company owner who produces a high-tech product while wasting the environment with his factory’s chemical waste and says “Is my highly profitable high-tech product less important than, say, a daily protest of people who are living around......
Join Now or Login to view the rest of this paper.
Approximate Word Count: 645
Approximate Pages: 3 (260 words per double-spaced page) |