I. Intro
1. The workers at Chernobyl were careless and unsafe.
2. The Russian-made power plant was unsafe.
3. More safeguards should be in place.
Thesis: Environmental problems caused by Chernobyl could have easily been avoided through safety precautions.
II. Body.
A. Argument 1. The workers at Chernobyl were unsafe.
1. Workers didn't know how to deal with fire.
2. Workers made uncertified tests.
3. Alarms were turned off.
Mini-conclu: harder testing and training should be done.
B. Argument 2. The Russian-made power plant was unsafe.
1. Regulations were lax
2. Russian safety at the time was bad
3.
Mini-conclu: reactors should be made safe, no matter who operates it
C. Argument 3. More safeguards should be in place.
1. Safe guards shouldn't be able to be turned off.
2. Reactor exploded without warning.
3.
Mini-conclu: Reactors should be built safer.
D. Counter Argument.
The destruction of the power plant named "Chernobyl"......
Join Now or Login to view the rest of this paper.
Approximate Word Count: 936
Approximate Pages: 4 (260 words per double-spaced page) |