1. This analysis proposes an examination of the function of myth in differing postcolonial contexts, and argues that particular contexts of class configuration and state hegemony define the way myths are developed in novels. The paradigmatic, resonant and symbolic quality of myths means that they cannot be easily contained and condensed, hence they encode resistance to the hegemonic drives found in the narratives of the state. State narratives interpellate the subject as intimately connected to it in an effort to ease out potential dissent from the social formation. Their monologic forms do not easily offer the subject any space to articulate dissent in the form of dialogue. Myth then offers a counter to this monologic form and encodes dissent particularly when located in novels produced in the context of entrenched power formations. Historical context then makes myth an appropriate form at specific times. It will be argued that myth acts out dissent in ways that go beyond......
Join Now or Login to view the rest of this paper.
Approximate Word Count: 7600
Approximate Pages: 30 (260 words per double-spaced page) |