An Assessment of Rationalism and Empiricism
Rationalism
I. Positive Evaluation
A. Rationalists point out that from a very few intuitively known mathematical theorems, reason can derive a body of theorems that amazingly hold true in our exploration of the physical world. How can one account for this correlation between what the mind rationally proves and what we observe in experience?
B. The Rationalists claim that without reason, experience would be a kaleidoscope of sights, sounds, tastes, odors, and textures without any intelligibility.
C. The Rationalists claim that we could never prove the laws of logic since all proofs assume them. The impossibility of proving the laws of logic indicate that we must know certain truths innately before we can gain any knowledge at all.
D. Hume would say "There are no logically necessary truths about the world." Isn't this assertion itself based on logic? If this claim is not a logically necessary truth than how can......
Join Now or Login to view the rest of this paper.
Approximate Word Count: 990
Approximate Pages: 4 (260 words per double-spaced page) |